Home | About Us | RSS Feed | Shopping Cart

Search all brands/categories

	Irrational Man: A Study in Existential Philosophy
	Rating
	List Price	$13.95
	Add to Shopping Cart
	Our Price	$9.86
	See our Partners Price
	Lowest New Price	$8.01
	Lowest Used Price	$1.36
	Features	ISBN13: 9780385031387 Condition: NEW Notes: Brand New from Publisher. No Remainder Mark.
	Categories	History & Surveys   General AAS   Modern   Existentialism   General   Paperback   Printed Books
Similar products
Basic Writings of Existentialism (Modern Library Classics) Existentialism from Dostoevsky to Sartre (Meridian) Ignatius of Loyola: Spiritual Exercises and Selected Works (Classics of Western Spirituality) On the Genealogy of Morality The Myth of Sisyphus: And Other Essays
Description
Widely recognized as the finest definition of existentialist Philosophy, this book introduced existentialism to America in 1958. Barrett discusses the views of 19th and 20th century existentialists Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Sartre and interprets the impact of their thinking on literature, art, and philosophy.
Customer Reviews
We exist. Deal with it.   2009-12-22
By Vincent Poirier (Tokyo, Japan)
Years ago, this book convinced me to throw Atlas Shrugged out the window. It is on my top ten list of works that have personally influenced me. Along with George Orwell's essay Notes on Nationalism, Irrational Man has instilled in me a deep distrust of systems that provide easy and simple solutions, but it did so without turning me into a cynic. Why are we here, what's it all for, what's the meaning of life? Are these empty questions? I think they are but where does the obsession to answer them come from? What can we do to satisfy this urge? The Existentialists sought to answer these questions and now their program is pretty much over, but did it fail or succeed? I'd say both. Existentialism fails utterly in providing a clear picture of what Man is. It doesn't resolve our angst, it doesn't tell us where we fit in the universe. On the other hand, Existentialists had the courage to ask these questions out loud at a time when physics and engineering seemed to be making us Masters of the Universe. Barrett first makes a successful case for modern art. Abstract art was quite controversial even as recently as the 50s but Barrett argues that artists could not have produced anything else. Certainly they could have copied the styles of the Renaissance masters, but such work would have been stale, limp, lifeless. We then are shown the limits of reason. When politicians were extolling the virtue of the "clean" hydrogen bomb and when all accepted the assertion, something just had to be wrong. We had mastered things but finding we were on the brink of self destruction and that it was our own fault, could we say that we had we mastered ourselves? The next section looks at four philosophers that represent Existentialism as it stood in 1957: Soren Kierkegaard, Friedrich Nietzsche, Martin Heidegger, and Jean-Paul Sartre. Kierkegaard and Nietzsche particularly deserve our attention. They lived through, in the 19th century, their own personal angst ridden existential crisis, well before the malaise spread to more and more people in the 1940s and 1950s. They were not academic philosophers but they had mastered academic technique and it is by choice and necessity that they expressed themselves as passionately as they did. Their answers were diametrically opposed: Kierkegaard's was to have Faith, while Nietzsche's was that God was dead. Heidegger had many years of active life left to him when Irrational Man was published, so perhaps Barrett can be forgiven his enthusiasm for this pseudo-philosopher superstar. At least he does a good job of explaining clearly what it was that bothered Heidegger: "... a table is an article of furniture; articles of furniture are human artifacts; human artifacts are physical things; and then, with the next jump of generalization, I can say of this table merely that it is a being, a thing. "Being" is the ultimate generalization I can make, and therefore the most abstract term I can apply to it, and it gives no useful information about the table at all." If Heidegger had stopped there, everything would have been fine. Arguing about the meaning of the copulative verb "To Be" yields no wisdom at all. Instead of accepting this answer Heidegger throughout his career deconstructed language for thousands of pages, trying to convince us that this most general of abstraction needs to be abstracted again, that we must go back 2500 years to the dawn of philosophy and change our minds. That's tripe. Verbiage isn't an answer and Heidegger belongs in the dustbin. Sartre, another philosophy superstar, fares better. As an academic philosopher he was as guilty of meaningless drivel as Heidegger was, but as a playwright and novelist he illustrated the angst of his time with force and clarity. Barrett does close with an answer and to my mind it justifies the entire Existentialist project. He relates the story of the Furies from the plays of Aeschylus. Orestes killed his mother to avenge her murder of his father, but the primal instinct against matricide is older than society and reason so the Furies, being ancient earth goddesses, move to tear Orestes apart. Apollo intercedes on behalf of Orestes, but the parties find themselves in a stalemate. Athena intervenes to resolve the issue. Orestes is saved but humbled before the Furies. We must respect these ancient urges and instincts within ourselves; we must acknowledge our animal nature rather than repress it. We cannot reason away our urges. The existentialist project doesn't tell us who we are or what our place in our universe is. I think no philosophy can do that; such questions are unanswerable. But it does tell us what we can do. We exist, we must deal with that. Vincent Poirier, Tokyo
"The best English introduction to the subject [of Existentialism]"   2009-11-30
By Brisbane reader (Brisbane, Australia)
Leo Strauss, in 1958, said that William Barrett's "Irrational Man" "is...the best English introduction to the subject [of Existentialism]." Existentialism is one form of radical historicism (or historical relativism) that came before its most recent manifestation, postmodernism. The cardinal thinker of radical historicism (or historical relativism) in both forms is the Nazi Martin Heidegger (1889-1976) whose masterwork is Being and Time (e.g. the Introduction and Section 44c).
thumbs way up   2007-10-25
By Jason L. Canney
A great introduction to existentialism. Easy to read. I read and re-read various sections for pleasure.
Wow   2007-10-05
By Paul T. Korson
What a great book to bring someone into exelstentialism. While Barrett has a slight bias towards Kierkegard and Nietzsche he makes great connections between romanticism and the precursors to modernity. Great quick read that has some great insights.
Indispensible!   2007-03-26
By F. Petillo (Madison, WI)
"Irrational Man" is a classic work that is as important now as it was 40 years ago. I first read this in high school in the 60s and found it captivating. The experience must have fermented because about ten years later I went back to school to study philosophy through grad school. A second reading was even better than the first. Barrett does an outstanding job of putting the whole project of Western philosophy in perspective. This book is entirely accessible to someone without formal training in philosophy, and the experience of reading it will be richly rewarded.